<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Chopsake.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chopsake.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chopsake.com</link>
	<description>The Chopsake Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:06:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why the TI-83 sucks&#8230; by Brian</title>
		<link>http://chopsake.com/why-the-ti-83-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chopsake.com/?p=5#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Just tried this out on my TI-83 Plus, and while the only way I could find the hyperbolic trig functions is through the catalog (like you said), you don&#039;t have to scroll all the way through the list to get to them.

Use the alphabetic keys once in the catalog to skip ahead.  For example, hit the LN button (natural log) to get to the S&#039;s (sinh is not too far into the list), hit PRGM to get to the C&#039;s for cosh, etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just tried this out on my TI-83 Plus, and while the only way I could find the hyperbolic trig functions is through the catalog (like you said), you don&#8217;t have to scroll all the way through the list to get to them.</p>
<p>Use the alphabetic keys once in the catalog to skip ahead.  For example, hit the LN button (natural log) to get to the S&#8217;s (sinh is not too far into the list), hit PRGM to get to the C&#8217;s for cosh, etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 Includes New Psychedelic Wallpaper by Fritz</title>
		<link>http://chopsake.com/windows-7-includes-new-psychedelic-wallpaper/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Fritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 05:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chopsake.com/?p=57#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Of course they are included with Windows 7, but you may want to try a Google Image search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course they are included with Windows 7, but you may want to try a Google Image search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 Includes New Psychedelic Wallpaper by Dave</title>
		<link>http://chopsake.com/windows-7-includes-new-psychedelic-wallpaper/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 04:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chopsake.com/?p=57#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Do you know where I could get those files?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know where I could get those files?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Safari 4 Passes Acid3 Test, Private Browsing Sucks by Paul</title>
		<link>http://chopsake.com/safari-4-passes-acid3-test-private-browsing-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chopsake.com/?p=132#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Apple Safari takes more resources compared to Opera and Firefox. sometimes it also freezes so i would still stick to Opera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple Safari takes more resources compared to Opera and Firefox. sometimes it also freezes so i would still stick to Opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Safari 4 Passes Acid3 Test, Private Browsing Sucks by Fritz</title>
		<link>http://chopsake.com/safari-4-passes-acid3-test-private-browsing-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Fritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chopsake.com/?p=132#comment-80</guid>
		<description>&quot;A New Mac Tip Every Day&quot; http://www.tips4mac.info/?p=1537 writes that entering private browsing in Firefox while downloading stops the download.  It looks like both browsers have a little work to do on their &quot;private browsing&quot; features!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A New Mac Tip Every Day&#8221; <a href="http://www.tips4mac.info/?p=1537" rel="nofollow">http://www.tips4mac.info/?p=1537</a> writes that entering private browsing in Firefox while downloading stops the download.  It looks like both browsers have a little work to do on their &#8220;private browsing&#8221; features!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Safari 4 Passes Acid3 Test, Private Browsing Sucks by Chopsake.com &#187; Victory for Firefox 3.5</title>
		<link>http://chopsake.com/safari-4-passes-acid3-test-private-browsing-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Chopsake.com &#187; Victory for Firefox 3.5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 01:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chopsake.com/?p=132#comment-68</guid>
		<description>[...]  Safari 4 implemented a similar feature, but Firefox does a better job of it—Safari 4 doesn&#8217;t bother to insulate your existing cookies when entering private browsing, so sites like Google that have previously stored cookies on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Safari 4 implemented a similar feature, but Firefox does a better job of it—Safari 4 doesn&#8217;t bother to insulate your existing cookies when entering private browsing, so sites like Google that have previously stored cookies on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 Includes New Psychedelic Wallpaper by Robert Stigers</title>
		<link>http://chopsake.com/windows-7-includes-new-psychedelic-wallpaper/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Stigers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chopsake.com/?p=57#comment-59</guid>
		<description>I like the first wallpaper, mushroom trip a lot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the first wallpaper, mushroom trip a lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why the TI-83 sucks&#8230; by Fritz</title>
		<link>http://chopsake.com/why-the-ti-83-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Fritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chopsake.com/?p=5#comment-57</guid>
		<description>I picked up a used HP-49g off of Craigslist.  Although it&#039;s slow (the TI-83 Plus graphs much faster), the calculus operations are great.  It will differentiate and it will integrate both definite and indefinite integrals... plus a whole lot more that I haven&#039;t even started to tap into!  I think I may invest in an HP-50g which is much faster than the 49g.  Though I&#039;m still getting used to the RPN (which can be disabled), the stack is very useful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I picked up a used HP-49g off of Craigslist.  Although it&#8217;s slow (the TI-83 Plus graphs much faster), the calculus operations are great.  It will differentiate and it will integrate both definite and indefinite integrals&#8230; plus a whole lot more that I haven&#8217;t even started to tap into!  I think I may invest in an HP-50g which is much faster than the 49g.  Though I&#8217;m still getting used to the RPN (which can be disabled), the stack is very useful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Safari 4 Passes Acid3 Test, Private Browsing Sucks by Fritz</title>
		<link>http://chopsake.com/safari-4-passes-acid3-test-private-browsing-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Fritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chopsake.com/?p=132#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Although I have neither to test personally, I&#039;m told Opera 10.0 and the latest Google Chrome are now reaching 100/100 on the Acid3 test too.  Looks like it&#039;s catch-up time, Firefox!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I have neither to test personally, I&#8217;m told Opera 10.0 and the latest Google Chrome are now reaching 100/100 on the Acid3 test too.  Looks like it&#8217;s catch-up time, Firefox!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
